Archive for August, 2009

Four types of people

Tuesday, August 18th, 2009

Driving home today, I had the thought that there are basically four types of people.  Obviously this is a generalization of sorts, as any categorization is liable to be, but I think it sums up the main types you deal with in the political world.  This system stems from what I believe to be the fundamental conflict that divides our political views.  That is, the conflict between freedom and control, between liberty and equality, between individualism and collectivism, or one of many other formulations.  Using these two competing forces, four types are created, which are detailed below.  In this list, the first term describes how people wish to be treated, i.e. the conditions under which they wish to live.  The second describes how people wish others to be treated, i.e. how the government/state should treat them.

Freedom/Freedom – This would describe me, and many others described as libertarians, classical liberals, and some conservatives.  These are people who generally like to be left alone, and thus largely favor a limited government and minimal social controls.  They also would like others to be free, and are willing to accept that this means others will do and say things objectionable.  Clearly there must be limits and laws, but by and large "live and let live" is the motto here.

Freedom/Control – This describes a lot of liberals, as well as some conservatives.  These people wish the enjoy relative freedom on their own, but want the government to exert control over "other people" by means of things like progressive taxation, redistribution of wealth, social controls, etc.  The liberals that fit here are largely the "progressive" types who have no problem succeeding on their own, but resent the success of others.  Think people like Micheal Moore, or even Barack Obama, who enjoy living luxurious lives but also long for government control of the "little people."

Control/Control – These people are the rest of the liberals, as well as the remaining conservatives.  They desire a strong structure in their own lives, or they desire much to be provided to them by the government and others.  They are sometimes willing to accept dependence and even virtual slavery if it means a more comfortable life.  Many Obama supporters fit this description, as does anyone who favors an expansive welfare state with many entitlements.  These people often also wish to impose their preferences on others.

Control/Freedom – I don't know how many people fit here.  I suppose they would be those who wish to be controlled themselves, but see no reason why others shouldn't be free.  Most people who wish to be controlled think control is good in general and should be imposed on everyone the same.

Clearly some groups can fit into two or more categories.  Social conservatives are one such group that comes to mind. Some simply live life as they choose but accept the rest of the world doing its own thing, while others are more control-oriented and wish to see censorship and social controls.  They thus can fit into both Freedom/Freedom and Freedom/Control.  Liberals in general favor control of others, and thus would fit into either Freedom/Control or Control/Control.  Average moderate types would probably fit in between groups.  But largely, the end result is that some people are simply inclined to individualism and freedom, even if it means they have to take responsibility, while some value comfort and security even if it means they lose freedom.  Similarly, some see government as a necessary evil, and others see it as a tool for social engineering.  Both of these traits speak to a person's basic conception of government and their relationship with it.

The great divider

Wednesday, August 5th, 2009

There are a lot of things happening these days that I could have never dreamt of just a year ago.  A number of them were covered a couple posts ago.  Of all the current events taking place, though, I think one troubles me more than any other.  That is the way this administration, and its supporters, are dividing this country by demonizing anyone who disagrees.

To put it simply, I never imagined that I would feel like a genuine enemy of the state simply for stating my opinion.  Not an enemy in the exciting, rebellious way, but in the way that makes you feel scared and attacked by your own leaders.  Barack Obama and his fellow progressives have made it clear that if you dare oppose government health care, attend a tea party, confront a Congressman at a town hall, or question the direction he is taking this country, you are part of an "angry mob," and your anger is not genuine but rather "manufactured" by some controlling organization.  This is not being said by the fringes, like Keith Olbermann, the Daily KOS, HuffPo, etc. – this is the president himself and official figures.  Take for example Homeland Security, which has labeled us potential terrorists.

The whole approach is straight out of Saul Alinsky – isolate and alienate your opponent, and subject him to ridicule.  Don't treat him like he even has a right to exist – treat him as if he is fake and illegitimate.  Lay all sorts of clearly unrelated crimes at his feet, like when conservative hosts were blamed for George Tiller's murder.  Control the language and the narrative so as to make your viewpoint seem like the only acceptable one.  Take control of the media and render them complacent and irrelevant, serving merely as spokespeople and amplifiers for your message.  In short, gain as much power as possible, and brutally destroy your opponents.

Those of us who oppose the Obama agenda need to understand this is where he is coming from, as a former community organizer.  He has made this clear not only from his nasty, derisive rhetoric but also by the people he has appointed, the agenda he has supported, and the groups he has empowered.  He views this as a war, and he believes this is the chance to once and for all remake America and render opposing viewpoints moot, winning the battle for all time.  This is why things are moving so fast, why the change suggested is so massive and dramatic, why people in Congress can't even bother to read the bills, and why the bills themselves are created in secret by liberal leaders and progressive interest groups.  The idea is to get the framework in, get the power, get as much done as possible before we even have a chance to notice this.

The wages of this attack on our country are potentially severe.  If the progressives were to succeed, we would lose America as we've always known it.  Gone would be the days where you can choose how to live, how to raise your children, how to spend your money.  But thankfully, more and more people are waking up.  More people are realizing that the America wanted by Barack Obama is a single-party state of dependents, with everyone terrified to speak out.  The time is now to stand up and oppose this movement.  It doesn't matter who you voted for, or if you supported Obama at one point.  You can put that behind you and open your eyes to the nature of this man.  His mission has been made clear – now it is a matter of who will win the war, freedom or tyranny.  To be clear, it will be very hard.  But nothing less is at stake.